research

Exploring the Move Away from ‘Zero -Tolerance’ Policies: Evidence from Restorative Justice Practices in Texas and Michigan Schools
Job Market Paper, available at EdWorkingPaper: 24-1090
This study examines the impact of statewide Restorative Justice (RJ) policy reforms in Michigan and Texas on student disciplinary outcomes and behavior, in light of increasing concerns over the negative effects of zero-tolerance policies. As schools move away from exclusionary discipline practices, this research focuses on three primary questions: (1) Are these policies effectively implemented statewide? (2) Do they contribute to a reduction in problematic behaviors, such as bullying? (3) Does the distinction in policy implementation—Michigan’s prescriptive approach versus Texas’s permissive framework—affect outcomes? Utilizing school district-level data and a penalized synthetic control estimator for multiple treated districts, the analysis reveals that at state-level Texas shows an overall reduction in out-of-school suspensions and bullying incidents, while Michigan shows an increase. However, taking these as a main takeaway would be misleading, as at a fine-grained level, more than half of the Michigan school districts show a reduction in bullying incidents. The results are further discussed, revealing patterns of racial composition in the districts with respect to their success in implementation of reforms. The findings highlight the critical role of implementation fidelity and the importance of local context in assessing the success of RJ initiatives while also filling a critical gap in understanding the multifaceted consequences of RJ practices.
Presented at:
    Sep 2024, SREE – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, Baltimore, MD
    Nov 2023, APPAM – Association for Policy Analysis and Management, Atlanta, GA
    Nov 2023, SEA – Southern Economic Association, New Orleans, LA
Back to Baseline? How SNAP caseloads respond to dropping and then reinstating ABAWD work requirements (Joint work with Sarah Hamersma)
Using data from the US Census Bureau and Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, and employing quasi-experimental regression analysis, this project informs how changes in requirements for participation in a nutrition program can help in improving program access and combating inequality.
Presented at:
    Jun 2024, ASHEcon – American Society of Health Economists, San Diego, CA
    Nov 2023, APPAM – Association for Policy Analysis and Management, Atlanta, GA
Exploring the Relationship Between Mental Health Issues in Youth and Later Life Economic Outcomes
Using data from National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (1997 Cohort), and ordered probit regression analysis, this study explores the relationship between mental health issues in young adults and their long-term economic outcomes.
Presented at:
    Nov 2022, APPAM – Association for Policy Analysis and Management, Washington D.C.
    Jun 2023, ASHEcon – American Society of Health Economists, St. Louis, MO
Addressing Disproportionate Discipline: The Role of Mental Health Resources for Students with Disabilities
This study explores the relationship between mental health resources and the disproportionate use of exclusionary discipline—such as suspensions—among students with disabilities (SWDs). Using data from the North Carolina Education Research Data Center (NCERDC), we examine how the availability of mental health services affects suspension rates across different disability categories. By analyzing trends in disciplinary actions, including office referrals and suspensions, the study aims to inform policy discussions on how to better support SWDs and address disparities in school discipline. The findings provide insights into the potential role of mental health resources in promoting more equitable educational environments for students with exceptionalities.
Presenting at:
    Nov 2024, APPAM – Association for Policy Analysis and Management, National Harbor, MD